(972) 220-0547 is an Auto Insurance Robocall
Be cautious.
- Listen
- Transcript Hello, my name is Christopher. How are you doing today?
- Date Blocked
- Call Activity Active Last detected 3 days ago

Just last week, 8,257 people got Nomorobo protection!

It really works! I have a handicap husband so I still need a landline as a backup for my cell. Nomorobo stops over 75% of calls on our landline with that "one ring", Thanks.
— Judy, Nov 29th, 9:24am
I don't know how anyone could live without this wonderful programming in the world of today! A million thanks for the caring and determination you put into this for all people, everywhere. While there is still much to be done on the scamming front...calls to my home from Robo sources average about 75 -80% of all my calls. Those folks calling blocks of numbers at one time and single Robo calls have finally met their match and I finally have some long needed peace! I recommend it every chance I get to everyone I know!
— Christiane B, Nov 29th, 9:25am
It's great. Thanks for your excellent service.
— Clarence S, Nov 29th, 9:30am
It is wonderful. I smile everytime a call gets bounced with only one ring. I love this service.
— Rich W, Nov 29th, 9:46am

Thanks for making Nomorobo an important and useful option. It is a shame that Verizon (Mid Atlantic Maryland) no longer provides a similar service as they once did.It seems the phone company has a preference in favor of commerical interests over residential customers regarding robocall blocking. I have benefited by the 'one ring cut-off' of robocallers but wish it was a "no-ring". You provide a customer service that easily surpasses the phone company or government protection against such increasing intrusions on privacy.
— Jeff W, Nov 29th, 9:46am
Fantastic service! We used to get dozens of calls a week. Very few now go through.Thank you!
— George M, Nov 29th, 9:46am
It's terrific works like a charm
— Bob A, Nov 29th, 10:33am
norobo is a great system. The only thing is that the calls cannot be blocked until the phone rings once. Maybe that can be corrected in the future.
— Mike M, Nov 29th, 12:46pm